Archive

Archive for the ‘General Investing’ Category

A Warm, Snowy, Wintry Alaska Day: Spirits and Market Up

February 3rd, 2012 Nancy King No comments

Update: The snow got a bit carried away; like it buried us. We have about 10 to 12 inches in the drive. The car would high center before the front wheels were out of the garage. So, we are home-bound until the snow plow people come by tonight or tomorrow some time. Husband’s electric show blower takes care of the steps and a narrow trail at the bottom to the mailbox, but it can’t begin to handle 10 inches of snow on the driveway. I’ve had enough writing today; it’s time to move on to the washing, paying bills, etc. It’s interesting how my morning idea of a warm, showy, wintry Alaska day has changed to being house bound and a bit bored. Isn’t there a famous poem about being snowbound?

What a difference it makes for the temp to be twenty above rather than ten or twenty below. A sigh of relief and a letting go of bracing against the cold. On top of that the market has been up and I’ve been doing some buying—at least for the short-term. My rule is down 8% and out you go!!!!

I’m sitting here at my computer writing, listening to great classical music on my wireless radio (thanks, Daughter), and gazing out my window at the fluffy snow coming down.

I am writing  teacher background info for my stock analysis worksheet. Stock Market Game program teachers have been  asking the national office for a structured approach students can use to identify quality companies.

Getting Ready for the Super Bowl, Including Investing

February 2nd, 2012 Nancy King No comments

How are you getting ready for the Super Bowl Game? Are you preparing for the party you are giving? Are you getting ready to go to a friend’s house for their party? Are you going to a sports bar? Above all, are you set to watch the Super Bowl ads?

Here are some things to think about concerning Super Bowl ads and investing in the advertised companies. Thanks go to Allen Cox of the Maryland Council on Economic Education for creating this teacher background information for the Stock Market Game program high school student project.

National Public Radio reports the Nielson Co. estimates 111 million people watched the Green Bay Packers beat the Pittsburgh Steelers in Super Bowl XLV. It’s expected that the audience this year will be even larger because for the first time in the history of the event, it will be streamed live to mobile devices and computers. Socialtimes.com predicts an additional 1.585 million people will watch the game via NBC’s live stream.

Each year companies advertise their products and services during the Super Bowl. Because the Super Bowl is one of the largest consumer audiences in the world, companies view it as an opportunity to premiere new advertising campaigns and debut new products and services. In 1984, Apple Computer introduced its Macintosh computer with a memorable, futuristic ad that suggested Apple would overtake the computer dominance of IBM. According to the Kellogg School of Management blog, the 2011 Super Bowl served as a launching pad for advertising campaigns that included companies like E*Trade, Snickers, Chrysler, Bud Light, Cars.com and Volkswagen.

USA Today reported that advertising slots for this year’s Super Bowl were sold out by Thanksgiving 2011. However, this opportunity does not come cheap. For this year’s Super Bowl – Super Bowl XLVI – NBC is charging between $3 to $4 million (most ads go for between $2.5 and $2.8 million) for each 30-second commercial. Perhaps a sign of an improving economy, several long time Super Bowl advertisers like Pepsi and General Motors who did not advertise last year will be returning this year.

Some believe that spending the resources to advertise during the Super Bowl is a good investment for a company. William Spain at Marketwatch writes:   “You can’t get the kind of viewership the Super Bowl offers anywhere else and in terms of the cost to reach each one of them, it is actually considerably cheaper than some other top programming, notably NBC’s Sunday Night Football.”

He quotes George Belch, chairman of the marketing department at San Diego State University,  “That probably partly explains why many companies are still there and why they still think it is a good investment. Plus, the aura of curiosity [about the ads] is still there and with the public relations value around it, the value extends well beyond the commercial.”

Others believe that the impact of advertising during the Super Bowl is only slight. According to a study conducted by the Business Department of the University of Colorado, “Companies announcing the purchase of advertising slots during the Super Bowl broadcast may get a slight boost in their stock prices… perennial Super Bowl advertisers like Budweiser do not see an impact on their stock prices… where the corporation was not a regular Super Bowl advertiser there was an uptick in stock price of about one percent… For regular advertisers, the stock prices reaction was statistically negligible and was slightly negative.”(Campbell & Hughson, 2007)

For The Stock Market Game™ investor, the Super Bowl presents an interesting investment research opportunity. In this project SMG teams will decide on the effectiveness of Super Bowl advertising and predict the immediate impact of that advertisement on the price of stock.

On a slight tangent, but none the less interesting is Mark Hulbert’s debunking of the Super Bowl indicator. The Super Bowl Indicator suggests stocks will rise during the year if the winning team is from the original National Football League and will fall if the team is from the old American Football League. You can read Mark’s column here.

Click  Super Bowl Investing and you, too, can determine the effectiveness of Super Bowl advertisements and their impact on companies’ stock prices.  

Revenue Decrease for a Pirate Company Listed on Somalia Pirate Exchange

January 6th, 2012 Nancy King No comments

The U.S. Navy rescued 13 Iranians held hostage by Somalia pirates.

The flip side of this rescue was that it decreased the revenue the pirates would have otherwise obtained for eventually returning the hostages. Therefore, those Somalis who might have invested in this pirate company probably listed on the Somalia Pirate Exchange lost money today as the price of this stock undoubtedly tumbled.

The Somalia pirate exchange, the Harardheere Stock Exchange (“HSE”), opened for business in 2009 in Harardheere, Somalia, about 250 miles northeast of Mogadishu. It operates 24 hours a day. Pirate groups of a certain size register to trade on the exchange. Currently the exchange lists 73 entities. Individual investors donate weapons or pay cash to buy shares of one or more of the registered groups. Thus, pirate groups can raise money and weapons for expeditions and local investors can share in the profit—receive dividends—if the expedition is successful. Just as in the usual corporate world, not all pirate groups are successful. Currently however, the pirate business is up; in the first quarter of 2011 there were 97 attacks off the coast of Somalia, which is a 177 percent increase over first quarter of 2010. Wired has a fascinating (excellent graphics), non-typical economic analysis of the Somali pirate business.

Categories: General Investing, Living Life Tags:

Stock Market Game Leading Stocks

January 4th, 2012 Nancy King No comments

Yes, middle school and high school students can identify quality, high-performing stocks. The following was compiled by the New York office of the Stock Market Game program—the best performing stocks from student portfolios nationwide during fall semester 2011 (as of the end of Nov—the game ended Dec. 16th):

Company Ticker                                             9/6/2011   11/21/2011   Increase

5. Build-A-Bear Workshop               BBW          5.31          7.92              49%

4.  Aéropostale, Inc.               ARO           10.39        15.76            52%

3. Commercial Vehicle Group       CVGI             6.31         9.66              53%

2. American Dental Partners        ADPI          10.01        18.65            86%

1. Pharmasset, Inc.                          VRUS         70.53        134.14          91%

5. Build-A-Bear Workshop: At Build-A-Bear Workshop, their mission is to bring the teddy bear to life. Located mainly in malls, the company’s stores allow kids to design their own teddy bears and other stuffed animals complete with clothing, shoes, and a multitude of accessories. Customers can build bears online, too.

4. Aéropostale, Inc.: A mall-based, specialty retailer of casual apparel and accessories, principally targeting 14 to 17 year-old young women and men through its Aéropostale stores and 7 to 12 year-old kids through its P.S. from Aéropostale stores.

3. Commercial Vehicle Group: A leading supplier of fully integrated system solutions for the global commercial vehicle market, including the heavy-duty truck market, the construction and agriculture markets and the specialty and military transportation markets.

2. American Dental Partners: Helping dentists focus on drilling (and not billing) is the mission of the company. It provides management and support services for the growing group practice segment of the dental care industry. Through long-term service agreements, the company manages about 25 general and specialty dental practice groups operating some 275 dental facilities in more than 20 states, mainly in the eastern and midwestern part of the US.

1. Pharmasset, Inc.: A clinical-stage pharmaceutical company committed to discovering, developing and commercializing novel drugs to treat viral infections. Its primary focus is on the development of oral therapeutics for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (“HCV”). Congrats to the SMG students who uncovered its potential!

Take a break from the Stock Market with Intrade

August 21st, 2011 Nancy King No comments

Take a break from stock market watching and worrying. Take a break from watching the price of gold go up and agonizing about how much longer to let those gold investments soar.

Go to Intrade and buy or sell shares on whether Gaddafi will no longer be leader of Libya before midnight ET on August 31, 2011. Or how about buying or selling shares on whether any country currently using the Euro will announce their intention to drop it by midnight ET December 31, 2012. If that doesn’t catch your investing fancy, consider whether the monthly house price index for Vancouver, B.C. will be 121 or less before the end of 2013. Maybe your would like to buy or sell shares on whether Apple iPad unit sales will be 35 million or more in fiscal year 20011. There is something for everyone—business, climate and weather, construction and engineering, current events, entertainment, financial , legal.

Categories: General Investing, Living Life Tags:

The New NYSE

July 24th, 2011 Nancy King No comments

Today as I work on the Stock Exchange section for my stocks class, I am lamenting the transformation of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). I miss the NYSE I knew before it became a publicly traded corporation. It was a not-for profit organization with 1,366 firms/individuals who owned their seats on the Exchange; the floor was abuzz with trading activity, and a mass of paper lay strewn underfoot. For me the mystique is nearly gone. The NYSE is just another corporation struggling to keep up with the times and its competition.

What changes has the NYSE undergone?

• 2005  The NYSE acquired Arca—an electronic exchange (The Archipelago, an electronic communications network (ECN), was the Los Angeles and the San Francisco exchanges combined. These two exchanges had come together, eliminated their trading floors, and become an all-electronic exchange.) The acquisition of this all-electronic exchange allowed the NYSE to offer a market in options and futures and to compete with the Nasdaq’s automated transaction market.

• 2006  The NYSE became a publicly traded corporation (NYX) on the New York Stock Exchange to raise money for acquisitions and modernization.

• 2007  The NYSE merged with Euronext to become the NYSE Euronext group that manages the New York Stock Exchange and Euronext’s exchanges in Amsterdam, Brussels, and Paris. The NYSE Euronext became the first global (United States and Europe) equities exchange.

• 2008  The NYSE acquired the American Stock Exchange. This exchange is known as the NYSE Amex.

What exchanges make up NYSE Euronext group in the United States and in Europe?

NYSE Euronext is the umbrella exchange. It is the combined U.S. NYSE and the European Euronext (Belgium, France, Netherlands, Portugal, London) exchanges.

Sub-Exchanges

1. NYSE Amex: NYSE’s U.S. exchange for listing small and mid-sized companies
NYSE Alternext = NYSE Amex but in Europe for listing small and mid-sized companies

2. NYSE Arca: NYSE’s U.S. all-electronic trading platform for fast execution with anonymous market access

NYSE Arca Europe = NYSE Arca but in Europe with the all-electronic trading platform for fast execution with anonymous market access

3. NYSE Liffe U.S: NYSE’s new U. S. futures exchange that offers a range of precious metals contracts

NYSE Liffe = NYSE Liffe U.S. but in Europe. Liffe  (London International Financial Futures  Exchange) was first acquired by Euronext in 2001 before the NYSE-Euronext merger. It is an exchange for trading European derivatives, such as swaps, commodities, and currencies in Paris, London, Lisbon, Brussels, and Amsterdam. It is the second-largest derivatives trading business by value.

4. SmartPool: It is an European dark pool for block trading by institutional investors who want to trade promptly, anonymously, and in bulk with reduced market impact in 15 European countries and the four NYSE Euronext European markets.

My White Board Illustration of the above organization

The newest change in the NYSE

The newest development on the NYSE scene has just been announced. The Deutsche Borse is merging with NYSE Euronext. The Deutsche Borse owns the Frankfurt Exchange, the largest German exchange with locations in Spain, Luxembourg, Switzerland, and Czech Republic. It will own 60 percent of the New York Stock Exchange through its ownership of the NYSE Euronext group. This merger will result in a powerhouse for trading stock, bonds, commodities, and derivates throughout Europe and the United States.

When this merger is complete, will the NYSE exist in name and façade only?

Categories: General Investing, Living Life Tags:

QE2: What, How, Why

November 17th, 2010 Nancy King No comments

QE2: The Term

QE2—no, I’m not talking about the famous luxury cruise ship, nor am I talking about the Queen of England. QE2 is the new buzz word for the Federal Reserve’s attempt to stimulate the economy by increasing the amount of cash in circulation. QE stands for Quantitative Easing—money easing. The 2 indicates this is the second time the Fed has used this technique. The first QE took place from December 2008 through March 2010; the Fed added $1.7 trillion to the economy. Did QE work the first time? Did the economy begin to grow? Did we have job growth? Over the coming 8 months the Fed will add $850 billion to the money in circulation—a newly created $600 billion plus $250 billion left over from TARP. Will QE2 boost business and employment?

QE2: The Process

How does the Fed (the central bank of the United States) use QE2 to place additional cash in the system to stimulate spending, borrowing, and expansion? The Fed introduces the money through our nationwide banks, the ones you and I use every day. No, the Fed doesn’t walk through a bank’s side door nor in its back door carrying a suitcase of dollars. The Federal Reserve is a bit more sophisticated than that. They use a three step process.

  • Step 1: The Fed creates the new money and adds it to its own checking account. The Fed is the only entity in the United States that can create money out of thin air. And how does it do this? It might chant, “Boil, boil, toil, and trouble,” as it stirs its caldron, or as it waves its magic wand, it might sing, 

“With just a wave of my magic wand, 
Your troubles will soon be gone, 
With a flick of the wrist, And just a flash, 
You’ll land a prince with a ton of cash,” or it might yell, “Full speed ahead. Keep the presses running,” as it prints the money. But in this electronic age, the Fed quietly fabricates the money with a few key strokes on its computer. Ooh, what happens if there is a slip of the finger and the Fed generates an extra billion dollars or turns a billion into a trillion.
  • Step 2: The Fed transfers the newly created money to banks. The Fed can’t simply credit each bank’s account with more money. It must buy something from the banks in exchange for the money it hands out. The purchase must be something the Fed can hold, without deterioration, and resell at a later time if it so chooses. For QE2, the Fed is buying U.S. Treasury bonds owned by the banks—bonds that mature in five or six years and a few that mature in 30 years. Reportedly, the banks are disappointed the Fed isn’t buying more long-term 30-year bonds; the banks want to get rid of these higher risk bonds. However, the Fed doesn’t want to take on that risk either. Too many 30-year bonds would leave the Fed exposed to losses when interest rates rise. They would be holding bonds that pay 4.2 percent when new bonds might be paying 6 or 7 percent.

To encourage banks to sell their short-term bonds, the Fed is offering to buy the bonds for a higher price than the banks paid for them. The increased price also lowers the bond’s yield. As the price of a bond goes up, its yield goes down. Many everyday interest rates are based on the yield of these bonds. A major goal of the Federal Reserve is to keep interest rates low. The Fed has already used its standard approach for keeping interest rates low to stimulate the economy, and unemployment remains at 9.6 percent.

    • Step 3: The banks start the money circulating in two ways. First, the banks lend the money to businesses so companies can expand and hire additional employees to get the economy moving again. Second, the lower bond yields may entice banks to move more of their investment capital into stocks. This demand will drive up the price of stocks and the market will rise. Other investors will follow. As the market continues to rise, individuals will feel wealthier and will begin to spend.

    QE2: Why

    Why is the Federal Reserve resorting to QE2? Previously, the U.S. government tried to stimulate the economy with the TARP monies through “shovel ready” projects and additional government hiring, but so far the economy has been uncooperative; unemployment remains at 9.6 percent. What are the hoped for and possible outcomes of QE2?

    Stimulate the economy by providing additional money for banks to lend

    The banks receive the newly created money from the Fed for a specific number of their U.S. Treasury bonds. Thus, the Fed creates additional money for loans. But, do banks lack the money to loan? Reportedly, banks are holding $1 trillion versus the normal $4 to $8 billion.

    Or is the issue a lack of demand for loans from creditworthy borrowers? Why aren’t creditworthy businesses borrowing and expanding? Perhaps it is because companies are uncertain about the future—taxes, consumer demand, government action, regulations on the horizon, and general economic conditions. Reportedly, non-financial corporations are holding nearly $837 billion is cash as of the second quarter of 2010.

    Why aren’t individuals borrowing and spending? Remember, 9.6 percent are out of work, people have seen the value of their 401Ks drop, and many are living in houses that are worth less the amount of their loans. They are uncertain what the future holds. Individuals are holding $8 trillion in cash and savings; furthermore, their savings increased 6.1 percent during the second quarter of 2010. Is there a lack of money in the system? Maybe there is a lack of money circulating. I, for one, am holding a significant amount of cash because of uncertainties—tax increases, a decline in the stock market, unrevealed effects of the health care bill, the possibility of Cap and Trade and its unknown effects. I may need my cash as cash. I’m holding it as a fear hedge against an unknown future. Did the Fed do any market research before it decided to implement QE2?

    Maintain low interest rates

    The Fed’s standard method of lowering interest rates—directly cutting them—has been exercised fully. The Fed is now resorting to its other tool, QE2. QE allows the Fed to adjust bond yields by choosing how much to pay for the bonds they buy from the banks—the more they pay, the lower the yield. The Fed feels it is important to keep interest rates low to encourage business and consumer borrowing. The interest rates are already at record lows, and the lack of borrowing and expansion continues. Is the lack of available loans at low interest rates the problem? Perhaps business and individuals are quietly waiting to see what happens? Companies and individuals seem reluctant to incur debt at this time.

    Boost the stock market

    Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernake has suggested that by adding money to the banking system, the banks will take the money they don’t loan and will use to buy stocks and corporate bonds rather than low interest U.S. Treasury bonds. Increased demand for stocks means increased stock prices. If the stock market goes up, it creates the impression the economy is recovering. If the economy looks like it is recovering, we will feel that we have more money and will begin to spend; that will lead to increased employment. The Fed is simply creating demand for stocks by keeping bond yields very low and by adding money to the system. If this occurs, investors should be aware that this demand for stocks may not be built on strong company fundamentals such as increasing sales and earning growth rates.

    Monetize the U.S. debt

    Monetizing the debt means the U.S. government buys its own debt. The Fed creates money out of “thin air” and buys the U.S. debt held by nationwide banks. This puts newly created money into circulation and keeps interest rates low—aka money easing—while decreasing bank-held U.S. debt. QE2—monetizing the debt—is the only method the Fed has left to use to stimulate this economy and keep interest rates low.

    Throughout history and around the world monetizing debt has been a “no-no.” What’s wrong with monetizing the debt? It devalues the currency; it devalues the dollar by putting extra dollars in circulation—dollars that come from a nonproductive event. Monetizing our debt does not raise our gross domestic product (GDP).The new dollars do not come from the production of a product or a service.

    When the dollar is devalued, each dollar buys less, which leads to inflation and often hyper-inflation. Governments find it difficult to control inflation and painful to wring high inflation out of the economy. All goods and services become more expensive and their prices keep going up. Inflation is particularly difficult for people living on fixed incomes.

    Globally, a weaker dollar—a less valuable dollar—makes our goods less expensive for other countries to buy. This may increase out exports which in turn may put more people to work in these industries—civilian aircraft, semiconductors, vehicle parts and accessories, industrial machinery, organic chemicals, telecommunications equipment, plastic materials, and medicinal, dental and pharmaceutical preparations. Yet, a devalued dollar makes everything we import more expensive—crude oil, cars, medicinal preparations, automotive accessories, cotton apparel.

    In Conclusion

    In the final analysis, the Fed anticipates that buying $600 billion of existing U.S. Treasury bonds from banks and paying for them with newly printed money will supply cheaper and additional loan resources for businesses, consumers, and home buyers. The Fed believes this will stimulate additional borrowing, spending, and growth. Also, the Fed hopes the lower interest rate and return on government bonds will push investors into stocks. The increased demand for stocks will drive the market higher and help us feel wealthier so we resume spending.

    Categories: General Investing, The Economy Tags:

    Healthcare Insurance Company Profit Margins and CEO Compensation

    September 24th, 2010 Nancy King No comments

    The other evening in Econ and Stocks class I introduced my lecture about company profit margin by asking the following question: “What is the profit margin of grocery stores—Safeway, Kroger (Fred Meyer). In other words, how many cents of profit do you think grocery stores make on every dollar you spend there?” The guesstimates ranged from 8 to 20 percent. What is your best guess? The answer: ʇuǝɔɹǝd ǝǝɹɥʇ oʇ ǝuo. That’s my first point; profit margins are usually smaller than we think they are.

    My second point is that profit margins are industry specific (data can be found here). For example, the average profit margin for grocery stores it is 1 to 3 percent (one to three cents per dollar of sales ends up as profit), for the Application Software industry it is 21 percent, for the Soft Drink industry it is 10.4 percent, and for the Aerospace/Defense Products and Services industry it is 6.8 percent.

    My third point: check the accuracy of the information you hear. If the media is maligning a company or an industry—too much profit, executive salaries too high, etc.—check the accuracy of the impression. It may or may not be as they say it is. I then asked participants what kind of profit margins they thought healthcare insurance companies had—Cigna, WellPoint, Aetna. Participants felt the profit margins probably ranged between 30 and 40 percent. What is your estimate? The answer: ʇuǝɔɹǝd ㄥ˙ㄣ.

    Then one class participant suggested, “Healthcare insurance companies make lots of money because of the high volume of sales (revenues).” A cautionary note, if a company has a high volume of sales, they may have high expenses to turn that volume into profit. Okay, last year Kroger had revenues of $76,733M and WelllPoint had revenues of $56,382M. So that doesn’t seem to support that health insurance companies make “too” much money through their high volume of revenues.

    Then someone else said, “Yes, but look at the huge salaries the health insurance CEOs make.” What about that? Kroger’s CEO makes a base salary of $1.2M with a total compensation of $10.3M. WellPoint’s CEO receives a base salary and total compensation of $1.1M and $13M, respectively. So health insurance company CEO compensation does not seem to be out of line with at least grocery store CEO compensation.

    This discussion prompted me to come home and create the chart below. I included Pfizer because one of the participants is analyzing it; I included Johnson and Johnson because we agreed it is a “nice family company.” If you are thinking about high profit margins and CEO compensation, check out the “family friendly” Johnson and Johnson company.

    For this example I used the industry’s profit margin data from here, the company’s profit margin from here, and the executive’s base salary and total compensation from here .